Guest post casino

I confess that when I initially looked at this card, I did not think much about it. I presumed it was the Bible (or some other writ approved by the Church), and not very interesting. However, it has been and continues to be, for many writers of TdM commentary, a source of speculation. When we work with tarot cards, we make the assumption that every detail contributes to the meaning of the card. The problem is in determining what is genuine symbolic resonance and what is merely cleverness on our part, concocted symbolism leading us through rabbit holes of our own conscious design to intellectually determined conclusions (i.e., taking us where we had already decided to go). It is an especial dilemma for me because I love rabbit holes, but I love them when they lead me into unsuspected areas of discovery; I do not want to be (pardon the mixed metaphors) like my cat who catches sight of his tail, begins chasing after it, spinning like a dervish, and banging into furniture. The book La Papesse holds on her lap, at least in the Jodorowsky text, shows seventeen lines. The thing that bothers me is guest post casino that he is interested in making a career in the entertainment industry specifically music which means that he will most likely be travelling a lot. (In Jean Dodal’s deck, this second arcanum is named La Pances , which means “belly” and might signify the womb or Church.) This takes us to L’Étoile , which features a human woman, naked and pregnant; in the Jodorowsky-Camoin illustration, “she [bears a sign] on her rounded belly at the level of the navel evok[ing] a seed of life. She spreads fertility. What is received from on high, The Star, channel of universal generosity, pours toward the Earth to fertilize it.” Left: Le Toille from the Camoin/Jodorowsky TdM; Center: Le Toille from the Jean Dodal (1701) TdM currently preserved in the Bibliothèque Nationale à Paris; Right: L’Estoille Jean Pierre Payen (1713) restitution deck by Yves Reynaud It is an odd mark Jodorowsky refers to (it has always reminded me of a set of lips), but it has precedent in the Dodal and Payen decks. In most of the other historical decks, the mark has been diminished and appears to be an ordinary belly button, or it is not present at all. In the Dodal and Payen, and well as the Noblet, the naked woman is flesh-colored, except for her face, which is strikingly white, like the Popess’s. In 1709, Madenié made her face flesh-colored like the rest of her body, and so it is in every historical TdM type-II, as well as Jodorowsky’s deck, contributing to the distinct impression that in his recreation of an authentic Tarot de Marseille, he and Phillipe Camoin cherry-picked (or outright contrived) details to further the narrative they had decided upon. : post 6.5.